Log in


Mr Skoyen

About Recent Entries

Saguaro blooming May. 13th, 2012 @ 10:31 am

Founder Institute: the good, the bad... the gold Mar. 5th, 2012 @ 01:21 am

My co-founder Ilya and I have recently graduated from the San Diego chapter of the Founder Institute. There are many threads on start-up incubators on blogs and on Quora. Every class of such an incubator and each founder's experience is unique and, as a founder, you will have to decide for yourself whether joining an incubator is the right thing for your business. I will try to do my best in sharing my experiences unaltered by what I have read on Quora and other founders' blogs.

The good

There are many advantages in joining the Founder Institute. Here are some that I feel are the most important to me as a founder:

The mentors

Mentors are experienced serial entrepreneurs, corporate executives, and investors, who have "been there, done that, and have a t-shirt." The mentors give seminars on various subjects ranging from sharpening your company's vision, to hiring and firing, to raising capital. Every week, two or three mentors share their experiences and answer questions. You also get to meet with them outside of the classroom, and they help you figure things out. Even if you are a serial entrepreneur and have created successful businesses before (I have), you will find that you can learn a lot from the mentors. In fact, one of the reasons why mentors participate in this program is that they get to learn from each other as well. Which brings me to another advantage - the network.

The network of founders

During the course of the program, all participating founders work together, and help each other overcome obstacles. Working for a start-up company is a very intense experience. Being the founder of a start-up company is intense squared. The amount of responsibility, pressure, uncertainty and risk that you have to weather can be isolating. Once you start on this journey, you will quickly find out that most of your friends and relatives have a hard time relating to the challenges that you are facing. As mentors will tell you, start-up founders are crazy people with distorted perception of the world who do things that no normal person will do. The only people who can relate to this experience are other start-up founders. To some extent also lawyers, doctors and PhD students. Ask some of them, and they will tell you that peer support is critical for success and survival.

The business network

Even if you are a Harvard MBA (there was a Harvard MBA in our class), your professional network can always use a boost. Not only you get access to the mentors, but you also get access to their professional networks. The mentors will introduce you to people who can advance your business. Your classmates also become part of your network. If they persist with their businesses, they will certainly build up their networks very fast. In the months and years following the program you will benefit from their networks as well. If you graduate from the program, you also become a member of the graduate network, which unites several hundred entrepreneurs worldwide. I recently spoke to someone who graduated 3 years ago, and he said that for him, the Founder Institute graduate network is the most valuable long-term asset.

The pace

During the four months of the Founder Institute program you have to research the market, incorporate, build an alpha version of your product, test it with some customers, figure out your business model, and hire some help. That is a lot to accomplish in a very short time. Even more so, considering that most of the founders have a full-time or a part-time job while they are in the program. The truth is though, once you graduate, you have to pick up an even crazier pace. When you are on your own, it is very easy to start procrastinating and slow down, which is likely to kill your business. So, it is good to get used to it and gain speed while your group facilitator, your peers and mentors are holding your hand and making sure you are not running into walls.

The curriculum

The important thing to remember is that the program is only 3 years old, and they are changing and improving the curriculum every semester. We heard from the graduates of San Diego Spring 2011 semester that our curriculum was much stronger than theirs, and that their curriculum was stronger than the previous one. Personally, I think that the best thing about this curriculum is that it forces you to turn your idea into a real business. In fact, unless you manage to make a business out of your idea, you won't be able to graduate. I have seen one of the founders progress from toying with a "this is an X for Y" idea, which had no future, to building a unique B2B service for restaurants, which gained customer interest before it was even finished. I hope one day you will read about him in the Fortune magazine. This, however, brings me to the second part.

The bad

One of the things that I did not like about the Founder Institute was that the curriculum is the same for everyone in your class. The problem with that, in my opinion, is that businesses are different, and the same curriculum does not fit everyone well. One founder in my class has a company that makes awesome wall art, and she wanted to make it a profitable lifestyle business. At the same time, the program is tailored for building fast growing companies that require external funding and have a potential exit. Consequently, some of the work that she had to do in the program, was not beneficial for her business.

I think, the program works best for software businesses that can apply lean start-up model, build, test and iterate fast. Founders of companies that require making sophisticated hardware or conducting long-term research before a prototype of a product can be tested by real customers will likely find that the curriculum does not work out for them.

Each founder has to go through the same stages and has to provide the same deliverables as every other founder. The problem with that is that each company joins the incubator at a different stage. We applied to the program when we had a prototype. By the time the program started, we already had a beta version of the product and had already incorporated. In the three months between the time when we got accepted to the program and the time the program actually started, we watched many videos of previous semesters and have already done some of the work that we would be forced to redo again. I feel that had we not joined the program, our product would have been farther ahead by now.

The ugly

As I mentioned before, starting a company is a very intense experience. Throw in some additional pressure and unfairness, and it can get ugly. Especially when the person being treated unfairly is not prepared to handle it. Consider the following: 70% of the founders in our semester did not make it to the graduation. Some of them dropped out, some got kicked out. Two founders got kicked out one week before the graduation, right after the last session, which one of them missed because of a bad migraine. Imagine how frustrating that is, how unfair that feels, and how much it hurts! The whole class was eager to speak up for them, and some had done so. And had these founders handled the situation better, the ending may have been different. Unfortunately they didn't handle it well. And frankly, I don't think anyone of us would have been able to handle this well.

That said, the business environment outside of the Founder Institute program is just as unfair. Ask any investor what they are looking for in an early stage company, and you will hear the words "unfair advantage". Ask founders who have gotten acquisition offers from big companies that walked away after hands have been shaken. It gets ugly!

Getting rejected is an unpleasant experience. And yet, I think that the Founder Institute benefits those who fall out of the program. They will either persevere and eventually succeed, or give up and avoid the inevitable and devastating failure.

The gold

Companies that graduate from the Founder Institute are very early stage, and are not ready to get funded. Usually, it takes one to two years before a Founder Institute graduate raises a seed round. We have been bootstrapping Citybot so far, so I cannot say anything certain about how helpful the Founder Institute is for raising external funding. I read a blog of a graduate, who did not give the institute any credit for his company's seed round. I have also spoken to another graduate, who raised a seed round last year, and he told me that the Founder Institute network was instrumental in getting his business funded.


Закрывают очередной детский дом с человеческим лицом Jan. 28th, 2012 @ 09:10 am
via ludmilapsyholog at Закрывают очередной детский дом с человеческим лицом
Похоже, Система не терпит  такие просто органически.
В Реутово есть детский дом. Маленький, всего на 19 детей. С домашней атмосферой, человеческими отношениями, постоянным пристуствием волонтеров. С хорошим состоянием и развитием детей. Разговоры о его закрытии шли давно, конечно, не монстры же на 100 человек закрывать. А тут -- делов-то, распихать 19 ревущих детей по автобусам да развести по огромным детдомам в соседних районах, где им придется вкусить своими незагрубевшими телами и душами все прелести "нормального" учреждения .  И все прелести травли "новеньких", более благополучных, более любимых совсем недавно, а значит неизбежно вызывающих ненависть самим своим видом у детей, более одиноких и несчастных. Потерять друзей, связи с родственниками, которым будет сложнее их навещать в другом районе. Потерять учителей, одноклассников, кружки, к которым привыкли и в которых были успешны. Потерять шефов, которых в новые учреждения еще то ли пустят, то ли нет. 

А просто городу нужен детский сад. А Министерству -- отчитаться о сокращении сиротских учреждений, не ударив пальцем о палец для семейного устройства детей. Можно было бы создать вместо этого детского дома 3-4 профессиональные семьи --  не такая уж и сложная задача. Можно было бы провести информационную кампанию в Реутове и окрестностях, обратиться к местным жителям, дети-то хорошие, ими много занимались, они незапущенные, многим осталось всего несколько лет до самостоятельности,  разобрали бы. Только это ж работать надо. Проще чемодан-автобус-чужой детдом.

Если бы кого-то интересовали дети и развитие семейного устройство, то надо было бы делать наоборот. Именно такие учреждения сохранять, создавать поблизости службы устройства, провожать детей в семьи. Отправлять туда на стажировку персонал из учреждений-монстров, потом разукрупнять те. Но это опять же если работать, а не отчеты писать.

Все произойдет уже в понедельник, в срочном порядке. Детям не дали даже закончить учебный год, а воспитателям их психологически подготовить. Осталось полрабочего дня. Давайте попробуем это остановить. Пожалуйста, прямо сейчас сделайте перепост.

И, если вдруг кто  сейчас на низком старте в смысле брать ребенка, может, подумаете об этих ребятах?

Под катом -- письмо, направленное "Отказниками" в Минобраз Мособласти, там подробнее все изложено. И вежливее. А я уж, извините, как думаю.

Read more...Collapse )

Подписать письмо можно здесь http://www.otkazniki.ru/forum/index.php?showtopic=19194&hl=

Или на Демократоре http://democrator.ru/problem/6415

ПЕРЕПОСТ Dec. 9th, 2011 @ 11:16 pm
шесть требований к власти.
- Немедленное освобождение политзаключенных.
- Отмена итогов фальсифицированных выборов.
- Отставка Чурова и расследование его деятельности.
- Расследование всех фактов фальсификаций на избирательных участках.
- Регистрация оппозиционных партий.
- Проведение открытых и честных выборов

Стыдно за вс это. Это не парламент May. 27th, 2011 @ 12:12 am
Other entries
» Now all I need is a CloudDJ console with built in Verizon 4G.
Maybe with a little help from Native Instruments or Ableton Amazon give me that in addition to the CloudDrive? http://techcrunch.com/2011/03/28/amazon-cloud-drive-player/

» A word about Color
Commenters on the tech blogs are eager to jump on the bandwagon and bash Color's $41 mil investment as a clear sign of a bubble. At first I thought so too. Granted, the app has a two star rating, is not immediately intuitive, and is otherwise only marginally useful. Yet, I disagree with all of you who are saying that this will be a massive flop. The way I see this, is that Color's app is just a red herring which diverts attention from the underlying technology. However, the underlying technology that they've developed is pretty impressive, and has a lot more potential uses than yet another social photo sharing location aware phone app.

» Programming, Mathafacka! (via HN) (http://programming-motherfucker.com/)
"The path of the righteous programmer is beset on all sides by the inequities of the clueless and the tyranny of evil project managers. Blessed is he, who in the name of achievement and solid technology, shepherds the users through the valley of ineptitude, for he is truly his customer's keeper and the finder of lost solutions. And I will strike down upon thee with great vengeance and furious anger those who would attempt to deploy without testing. And you will know my name is zedshaw when I lay my software upon thee."

» kewl (via Hacker News) http://www.chipworks.com/en/technical-competitive-analysis/resources/technolo

» Stupid iPhone! There is no daylight savings time in AZ!
Sent from iPhone. Pardon my spelling.

Top of Page Powered by LiveJournal.com